Cases SCOTUS Ruled on That Align With Project 2025
Case: Trump v. US. Former President Trump conspired to overturn the 2020 Election
Case: Trump v. US 2024 Ruling gives the President of US, broad immunity from prosecutions
Case: Trump v. US 2024 Ruling gives the President of US, broad immunity from prosecutions
"Should Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas Recuse Themselves from the Supreme Court’s Insurrection Cases?"
“The Justice Department ought to do whatever it can to ensure there’s no appearance of bias among the justices,” BU legal scholar Jack Beerman says.
But they didn't recuse themselves from the Trump vs United States case. Three of the six conservative Federalist Society Justices, were appointed by former President Trump AND they ruled in his favor...
Case: Trump v. US 2024 Ruling gives the President of US, broad immunity from prosecutions
Case: Trump v. US 2024 Ruling gives the President of US, broad immunity from prosecutions
Case: Trump v. US 2024 Ruling gives the President of US, broad immunity from prosecutions
.jpg/:/cr=t:5.51%25,l:0%25,w:100%25,h:88.99%25/rs=w:388,h:194,cg:true)
Project 2025 is based on the premise that the President will not have any checks and balances on his power.
WASHINGTON (AP) — In an unsparing dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the Supreme Court allowed a president to become a “king above the law” in its ruling that limited the scope of criminal charges against former President Donald Trump for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol and efforts to overturn the election.
She called the decision, which likely ended the prospect of a trial for Trump before the November election, “utterly indefensible.”
Case: Snyder v. US 2024 The Supreme Court Just Legalized Bribery
Case: Trump v. US 2024 Ruling gives the President of US, broad immunity from prosecutions
Case: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org - Ended Federal Abortion protections
"In this latest 6-3 ruling, the Court reversed the bribery conviction of a former Indiana mayor, James Snyder, under 18 U.S.C. § 666 (Section 666). Section 666, in relevant part, prohibits “corruptly” soliciting or accepting anything of value with the intention of being “influenced or rewarded.” From Skadden Publications
Some people have suggested that this ruling means a president could "pardon" and then get paid for the pardons...
Did SCOTUS select and rule on this case because of their own undisclosed "gratuities"?
Case: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org - Ended Federal Abortion protections
Case: Seila Law LLC v. CFPB - This ruling is necessary so people loyal to Trump instead of loyal to
Case: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org - Ended Federal Abortion protections
"On June 24, 2022, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned 50 years of precedent, overruling Roe v. Wade. In the year following that decision, the pace of new legislation on abortion has been swift."
Project 2025 Page 6 "Finally, conservatives should gratefully celebrate the greatest pro-family win in a generation: overturning Roe v. Wade, a decision that for five decades made a mockery of our constitution. But the Dobbs decision is just the beginning. Conservatives in the states and in Washington, including in the next conservative Administration, should push as hard as possible to protect the unborn in every jurisdiction in America."
Many pages in Project 2025 talk about ending abortion nationally.
Case: Seila Law LLC v. CFPB - This ruling is necessary so people loyal to Trump instead of loyal to
Case: Seila Law LLC v. CFPB - This ruling is necessary so people loyal to Trump instead of loyal to
Case: Seila Law LLC v. CFPB - This ruling is necessary so people loyal to Trump instead of loyal to
"Opinion analysis: Court strikes down restrictions on removal of CFPB director but leaves bureau in place"
This is a significant move towards making it easier for the next republican president to "FIRE" presidential appointees & replace with their loyalists.
PROJECT 2025 page 560: "One example includes potentially seeking the overruling of Humphrey's Executor v. United States. This case approved so-called independent agencies whose directors are not re-movable by the President at will. The Supreme Court has chipped away at Humphrey's Executor in cases like Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,
but the precedent remains. The next conservative Administration should formally take the position that Humphrey's Executor violates the Constitution's separation of powers."
Case: 303 Creative vs Elenis 2023 - Ruling discriminates against LBGTQ+ communities
Case: Seila Law LLC v. CFPB - This ruling is necessary so people loyal to Trump instead of loyal to
Case: Seila Law LLC v. CFPB - This ruling is necessary so people loyal to Trump instead of loyal to
"In Justice Sotomayor's dissent she said: "The Court also holds that the company has a right to post a notice that says, “ ‘no [wedding websites] will be sold if they will be used for gay marriages.’ ” Ibid.
Many pages in Project 2025 speak negatively about the LBGTQ+ community. Project 2025 would prefer the community go back into the closet stripping them of the right to be who they are.
Cases Settled That Pave The Way To Implement P25
Case: ELECTIONS
Democracy Docket (Mark Elias) watches every state for new lawsuits regarding voting rights, election
Case: ELECTIONS
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Case: Chevron
Democracy Docket (Mark Elias) watches every state for new lawsuits regarding voting rights, election
Case: ELECTIONS
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Democracy Docket (Mark Elias) watches every state for new lawsuits regarding voting rights, election
Democracy Docket (Mark Elias) watches every state for new lawsuits regarding voting rights, election
Democracy Docket (Mark Elias) watches every state for new lawsuits regarding voting rights, election
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy
Case: Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Democracy Docket (Mark Elias) watches every state for new lawsuits regarding voting rights, election
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Case: Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Case: Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Case: Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System