"Should Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas Recuse Themselves from the Supreme Court’s Insurrection Cases?"
But they didn't recuse themselves from the Trump vs United States case. Three of the six conservative Federalist Society Justices, were appointed by former President Trump AND they ruled in his favor...
Project 2025 is based on the premise that the President will not have any checks and balances on his power.
WASHINGTON (AP) — In an unsparing dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the Supreme Court allowed a president to become a “king above the law” in its ruling that limited the scope of criminal charges against former President Donald Trump for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol and efforts to overturn the election.
She called the decision, which likely ended the prospect of a trial for Trump before the November election, “utterly indefensible.”
"In this latest 6-3 ruling, the Court reversed the bribery conviction of a former Indiana mayor, James Snyder, under 18 U.S.C. § 666 (Section 666). Section 666, in relevant part, prohibits “corruptly” soliciting or accepting anything of value with the intention of being “influenced or rewarded.” From Skadden Publications
Some people have suggested that this ruling means a president could "pardon" and then get paid for the pardons...
Did SCOTUS select and rule on this case because of their own undisclosed "gratuities"?
"On June 24, 2022, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned 50 years of precedent, overruling Roe v. Wade. In the year following that decision, the pace of new legislation on abortion has been swift."
Project 2025 Page 6 "Finally, conservatives should gratefully celebrate the greatest pro-family win in a generation: overturning Roe v. Wade, a decision that for five decades made a mockery of our constitution. But the Dobbs decision is just the beginning. Conservatives in the states and in Washington, including in the next conservative Administration, should push as hard as possible to protect the unborn in every jurisdiction in America."
Many pages in Project 2025 talk about ending abortion nationally.
"Opinion analysis: Court strikes down restrictions on removal of CFPB director but leaves bureau in place"
This is a significant move towards making it easier for the next republican president to "FIRE" presidential appointees & replace with their loyalists.
PROJECT 2025 page 560: "One example includes potentially seeking the overruling of Humphrey's Executor v. United States. This case approved so-called independent agencies whose directors are not re-movable by the President at will. The Supreme Court has chipped away at Humphrey's Executor in cases like Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,
but the precedent remains. The next conservative Administration should formally take the position that Humphrey's Executor violates the Constitution's separation of powers."
"In Justice Sotomayor's dissent she said: "The Court also holds that the company has a right to post a notice that says, “ ‘no [wedding websites] will be sold if they will be used for gay marriages.’ ” Ibid.
Many pages in Project 2025 speak negatively about the LBGTQ+ community. Project 2025 would prefer the community go back into the closet stripping them of the right to be who they are.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Copyright © 2024 Elections Matter Now - All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.